Gold
and Powerlessness:
Looking at Masculinity in Once Upon a Time’s Rumplestiltskin
Looking at Masculinity in Once Upon a Time’s Rumplestiltskin
“I came because... you're right... about me. I am a
coward. I have been my entire life. I tried to make up for it by collecting
power; and the power became so important that I couldn't let go. Not even...
when that meant losing the most important person in my life.” (Kitsis, 2011). This
quote is from the character Rumplestiltskin, also called Mr. Gold, in the
television series Once Upon a Time. Once
Upon a Time is produced by ABC, owned by Disney, and takes characters from
fairy tales, fables, and more modern stories, like The Wizard of Oz and Frankenstein.
As Rumplestiltskin is one of the main characters and acts as an
occasionally antagonistic character for the designated protagonists, Rumplestiltskin
demonstrates an interesting concept of masculinity and the masculine persona,
and can have his character broken down and observed through the lenses of
symbolic interactionism and queer performance theory.
In regards to symbolic interactionism, it claims that people
use labels to create roles for themselves and others, and often associates with
symbols or traits to create that role (Wood, 2011, p. 50). Rumplestiltskin’s
role in the series is an occasional antagonist, and in this he possesses three
roles that can be observed: the Dark One, a magical entity that is incredibly
powerful and malevolent, Rumplestiltskin, before his transformation into the
Dark One when he was a father and a husband, and Mr. Gold, when he was moved to
the world without magic in Storybrooke (Kitsis,
2011). Looking in how his character is
created in both the real world of Storybrooke and the world of the Enchanted
Forest and the symbols associated, one can determine how Rumplestiltskin is
made more masculine. In the Enchanted Forest, he is symbolized by the Dark
One’s dagger, a magical artifact that had cursed him, but had given him great
amounts of power and near-immortality (Kitsis, 2011). From this, it connects to
an idea of masculinity to “be aggressive” as like other males in media, and
falls into the stereotypical portrayal of men as violent, and unafraid (Wood,
2011, p. 153, 235). The dagger, which symbolizes power and the only way that
Gold can be killed, can also be taken as a sign of masculinity in a setting
where firearms would be out of place.
Furthermore, as he continues his time as the Dark One, his own body
becomes less human and more monstrous, reflecting a sicker persona, and one
that becomes progressively more violent and deranged till the curse that set
the story into motion occurs (Kitsis, 2011).
The violent aspects of his character as the Dark One are just
part of what defines his masculinity under symbolic interactionism. Before
becoming the Dark One and when he is Mr. Gold, the way in which his masculinity
is labeled differs, as do the symbols by which he is seen as masculine. Before his transformation, Rumplestiltskin’s
labeling is frowned upon by his fellow villagers, and is what pushes him to
become the Dark One, as he is deemed “too weak” for injuring himself to make
sure his son had a father. While this is an atypical portrayal of men as
fathers in itself, it is also something that goes against a requirement for being
a man, and thus labels him in a poorer light by his wife, who calls him the
village coward, and laments being attached to him (Kitsis, 2011). Because of this, it pushes Rumplestiltskin to become
more masculine as a character and pushes him towards violence in a way to
express himself as a man. As Mr. Gold, the symbols used to create his
masculinity are subtler, as the knife is missing, along with his magic.
However, his cane and suit are used to create a powerful presence and takes
cues from businessmen in how they create a sense of authority. While this lacks
the same emphasis on masculinity that his dagger has as Rumplestiltskin, it
carries a different interpretation of masculinity as the business man, and is
even reflected by how he’s described when he is introduced, as it’s said he
“owns this place (Storybrooke)” (Kitsis, 2011).
Rumplestiltskin’s character under an interpretation of Queer
Performance, seeing how he violates norms of masculinity, is even more complex
in determining gender. Going back to the quote used to describe himself,
Rumplestiltskin states his cowardice (Kitsis, 2011). Immediately, this is shown
as admitting vulnerability, something that is usually seen as more feminine and
less masculine in nature (Wood, 2011, p. 151). He does this other times through
the second season, basing his worth on his relationship with other characters,
like Belle and his son, Neil. There are multiple moments where he admits that
his use of magic is a crutch, and his adoption of the violent and stereotypically
masculine persona of the Dark One were bad ideas, and that it costs him
relationships that he cares about (Kitsis, 2011). Essentially, he is admitting
to his outward appearance and actions as a façade, and is debatably comparable
to the examples Wood uses of Spiderman or Tom Hanks in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, as Rumplestiltskin is played
in slightly redeeming views, both as a father that wanted to save his son and
as a loving grandparent willing to give up his life for his grandson (Wood,
2011, p. 233; Kitsis, 2011). In addition, his role is less overtly sexual like
would be expected of a villain in a series. While he does have relationships
with three women at various points of the show’s chronology, a strong show of
sexuality is debatably only shown in one of them. In contrast, a different
relationship is largely devoid of shows of sexuality and is more centered on
keeping himself morally grounded and emotionally healthier, as he describes
that she’s the only one that can see “past the mask of the monster” (Kitsis,
2011).
Rumplestiltskin is an interesting example of masculinity
in media, and he enjoys a complex portrayal due to the multiple roles created
for him, and the ways that he defies traditional masculinity. As an antagonistic
character this is even more impressive as while he is threatening at times,
especially when performing his role as the “Dark One” his moments of weakness
and admittance of vulnerability is even more striking, contrasting with other
villains in Disney’s repertoire and allowing for the creation of a fully human
and emotive character that demonstrates different and varying aspects of
masculinity throughout the series.
Works Cited
Kitsis, E. (Executive Producer). (2011). Once Upon a Time [Television
series]. Hollywood: American Broadcasting Company.
Wood, J. T. (2013). Gendered lives: communication, gender
& culture (11th ed.). Stamford: Cengage Learning.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tell me what you think?